Italian pharmacy online: cialis senza ricetta medica in farmacia.

Microsoft powerpoint - presentation02(dr w c ip 25 may 02)

* This presentation is prepared by the author in one’s personal capacity for the purpose of academic exchange and does not Rationing Health Service – Priority Setting
represent the views of his/her organisations on the topic discussed. Journal Presentation
Article: Rationing Hospital Services in HK: Priority
setting by clinicians using Delphi method Dr W C Ip
Journal: Health Services Management Research
Grand Round in Administrative Medicine
Author: Peter Yuen, Derek Gould, MY Cheng
25 May 2002
Book: Rationing in the NHS: Principles & Pragmatism
Authurs: Bill New & Julian Le Grand
Rationing Hospital Services in HK
Rationing Health Service – Priority Setting
New Zealand’s Experience
Article: ‘Reforming New Zealand’s Health Care System’, ¾ Purpose: Identify interventions that should Nicola North, Int’l Journal of Public Administration, Rationing Health Service – Priority Setting
Rationing Health Service – Priority Setting
Delphi Method
ƒ Based on pooled judgementƒ Participants are anonymous to each other ƒ make responses/judgement without coming Final List
See Words file: “Prioritization – Final List”
Interventions receiving high
Clinical Oncology
scores from the final Delphi round
• Surgical scar / prophylactic irradiation Ear, Nose and Throat Medicine
Obstetrics & Gynaecology
• Non-urgent cases at A&E / all treatments • Special brand name instead of generic • Termination of Pregnancy without medical Ophthalmology
Orthopaedics & Traumatology
• Refractive error / LASIK or refractive Paediatrics
• Cord blood banking for possible future use • Cutaneous acquired lesion (e.g. tattoo) / Observations
Conclusions
High Score Interventions:
Diverse views amongst COSs regarding
effectiveness of certain interventions
ƒ Prevention & Early Detection Services
ƒ Patients’ choices: e.g. cosmetic surgery, child delivery by
Diverse reasons (other than cost-effectiveness) for
doctors, sex-related treatments, etc.
determining which intervention to charge
ƒ Small no. in the final list: 127 items
ƒ Final List Items are NOT the most expensive ones
Result of the exercise is not applicable
/high volume ones – cost recovery insignificant.
ƒ Few items with “questionable effectiveness”
The procedure (Delphi method) transparency and
ƒ Many are based on “Other reasons”
participation
ƒ 3 out of 9 items on the PPMI list received +ve score
Critiques on the Exercise
Critiques on the Exercise - Continue
Representativeness of COSs (no. ; specialties)
COSs allowed to prioritise interventions of other
The initial lists – how was it made up?
specialities.
Societal value not reflected
COSs are already doing prioritization on their own
services though implicitly – already biased
Exclusion List vs. Inclusion List ?
Other interested parties not included
Exclusion approach vs. Zero-based prioritisation
No specific criteria for “cost-effectiveness”
No specific criteria for “other reasons”
Rationing Health Service – Priority Setting
New Zealand’s Experience: Continue
New Zealand’s Experience
1990s: Aimed to draw up a list of “core service”
Organised “Consensus Conferences” to consult
that all New Zealanders are entitled to
the Public and Health Professional
within a reasonabl period of time
To agree on effectiveness or treatment for high
Health Services outside the list are to be
volume or high cost procedures
purchased privately
A statutory committee put in charge
New Zealand’s Experience: Continue
Rationing Health Service – Priority Setting
Criteria for Rational Rationing
Failed to produce a “list”
Maximum social benefit: cost-effectiveness, societal
Recommended that existing services in public
sector were the “De Facto Core”
General consensus through Democratic process:
Endorsed service purchasing principles: Value for
money; community values; quality over quantity, primary care over high-technology; community care over hospital Systematic & Formal methodology: to determine “list”
Developed Guidelines regarding health priorities:
Consistent, non-discretionary application
e.g. substance abuse; emergency ambulance service, Explicit : Listing in clear terms what are/are not provided
Rationing Health Service
Recommendations: Incremental Approach
(These are what HA is doing)
Expand PPMI list
Gradually introduce full/partial cost recovery
measures
Contain access
Any more ?

Source: http://www.hkccm.org.hk/Presentations/Presentation02DrWCIp25May02.pdf

Microsoft word - filippini02.doc

DIAGNÓSTICO Y TRATAMIENTO DE LAS DISLIPIDEMIAS La enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV), a través de sus distintas manifestaciones Enfermedad arterial coronaria (EAC), Enfermedad cerebrovascular,( ECV) y Arteriopatía periférica (AP ), constituye, en conjunto, la primera causa de muerte en el mundo occidental. Entendiendo a la ECV como un proceso de etiología multifactorial, nos limitaremos en

mat.msgsu.edu.tr

Although finer distinctions could be drawn, how aboutI suspect that the definition of eras differs somewhat according toone’s purposes. Yes, and this is where it gets really interesting. I have been reading On the Natural History of Destruction By W.G. Se-bald, essays on the reluctance of Germans to remember and discuss the Alliedbombings of Nazi Germany. Sebald is a unique voice. Reading hi

Copyright © 2010-2014 Pharmacy Drugs Pdf