Eanm procedure guidelines for radiosynovectomy

The purpose of this guideline is to assist nuclear medicine practitioners in evaluating patients who might be candidates for intra articular treatment using colloidal preparations of 90Y, 186 Re or 169Er providing information for performing these treatments.
understanding and evaluating the sequelae of therapy.
Radiation synovectomy/radiosynoviorthesis [RS] in this context means radionuclide therapy of joint synovitis or synovial processes by intra-articular injection of 90Y silicate/citrate OR 186Re sulphide OR 169Er citrate. Synovitis means inflammation of the specialised connective tissue lining of a joint cavity (synovium).
i 90Y emits a beta particle with maximum energy 2.27 MeV,
mean energy 0.935 MeV and average soft tissue range 3.6 mm.
ii 186Re emits a beta particle with maximum energy 1.07 MeV,
mean energy 0.349 MeV, average soft-tissue range 1.1 mm and a
9% abundant gamma emission with a photopeak of 0.137 MeV.
Iii 169Er emits a beta particle with maximum energy 0.34 MeV,
mean energy 0.099 MeV and average soft tissue range 0.3 mm.
Intra-articular injection of 90Y silicate/citrate, 186Re sulphide and 169Er Citrate is approved in Europe for the treatment of a range of refractory painful arthropathies. Physicians responsible for treating patients should have an understanding of the clinical pathophysiology and natural history of the disease processes, should be familiar with other forms of therapy and should be able to liaise closely with other clinicians involved in managing the patient. The treating clinician should either see the jointly with the rheumatologist or orthopaedic surgeon assuming overall management of the patient’s condition or be prepared to assume that role. The treating clinician should be appropriately trained and in the safe use and administration of 90Y silicate/citrate, 186Re sulphide and 169Er citrate therapy.
Clinicians involved in unsealed source therapy must be knowledgeable about, and compliant with, all applicable national and local legislation and regulations.
The facility in which treatment is administered must have appropriate personnel, radiation safety equipment, procedures available for waste handling and disposal, handling of contamination, monitoring personnel for accidental contamination and controlling contamination III. COMMON
90Y silicate/citrate, 186Re sulphide and 169Er citrate are indicated for the treatment of joint pain arising from arthropathies • spondylarthropathy (e.g. reactive or psoriatic arthritis) • other inflammatory joint diseases e.g. Lyme disease, • calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) arthritis • pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) • persistent effusion after joint prosthesis • undifferentiated arthritis (where the arthritis is characterised by synovitis, synovial thickening oreffusion CONTRAINDICATIONS
• Pregnancy• Breastfeeding• Local skin infection• Ruptured popliteal cyst [knee] • The radioparmaceuticals should only be used in children and young patients (<20 years) if the benefit of treatment is likely to outweigh the potential hazards.
• extensive joint instability with bone destruction • evidence of significant cartilage loss within the joint IV. PROCEDURE
The facilities required will depend on National legislation for the administration of pure beta emitting therapy agents. If in- patient treatment is required by National legislation, this should take place in an approved facility with appropriately shielded rooms and en-suite bathroom facilities. The administration of 90Y silicate/citrate, 186Re sulphide and 169Er citrate should be undertaken in a dedicated room, equipped for sterile injection procedures, by appropriately trained medical staff with supporting scientific and nursing staff.
Patient preparation
1. Patients considered for intra articular 90Y silicate/citrate, 186Re sulphide or 169Er citrate therapy will have failed at least one intra-articular injection of long-acting glucocorticoid (e.g.
methylprednisolone acetate or triamcinolone). Pain will usually be severe enough to limit normal activities and/or 2. Radiographs of the joints to be treated should be obtained and reviewed prior to undertaking RS. Weight-bearing views of lower limb joints should be requested specifically.
Symptoms attributable largely or exclusively to cartilage damage are unlikely to benefit from RS.
3. Additional imaging procedures may be useful but are not • Scintigraphic assessment of soft tissues and severity of active inflammation (e.g. by 3-(2-)phase 99mTc MDP/HDP/HEDP bone scintigraphy and/or 99mTc-HIG scintigraphy) of the affected joints.
• Ultrasound - to evaluate synovial structure and Thickness and exclude ruptured Baker´s cyst.
• Magnetic resonance imaging of the affected joint.
4. Time interval between arthroscopy or joint surgery and radiosynovectomy should be (2-)6 weeks and between joint puncture and radiosynovectomy 2 weeks. The minimum interval between repeated treatments in the same joint is 6 Information for the procedure
Patients should receive both written and verbal information about the procedure prior to receiving therapy, including the importance of immobilising the affected joint for up to 48hours post injection. Informed written consent must be obtained from 1. Patients should be told that 60 - 80 % of patients benefit from 90Y silicate/citrate, 186Re sulphide or 196Er citrate therapy.
2. Patients should be told that response is unlikely within 14 days of injection and may be delayed until up to one month.
3. Patients should be warned of the risk of a temporary increase 4. Patients should understand that radiopharmaceutical will not benefit other non-treated joints but some overall positive effect on other joints may be noticed if steroid is co-injected 5. Patients should be informed of the potential complications of i. Risks associated with joint puncture – local haemorrhage; bruising; infection (very rare); ii. Theoretical risk of exposure to beta emiting radiation including radiation necrosis (rare) and future iii. Risk of post injection pyrexia or radiopharmaceutical Administration
1. Joint puncture for radiosynovectomy carries the same risk as any joint puncture and should follow the rules of strict asepsis.
2. Local skin anaesthesia is advisable.
3. Correct deposition and homogeneous distribution of the radiopharmaceutical agent in the joint space is essential.
Puncture of all joints other than knee should be performed under fluoroscopic (X-Ray screening) or ultrasound guidance.
The knee can routinely be injected without imaging 4. If imaging guidance is not used (e.g. knee) then radiopharmaceuticals should not be injected unless intra- articular needle placement has been ensured by aspiration of joint fluid through the needle which is being used to inject the 5. A particle size of at least 5-10 nm is essential to avoid 6. Absolute immobilization of the treated joint(s) for 48 hours using splints or bed rest is recommended as this will reduce transport of particles through the lymphatics to the regional 7. Where possible, simultaneous administration of intra articular long acting glucocorticoids (e.g. methylprednisolone or triamcinolone) is recommended to reduce the risk/severity of acute synovitis and to improve treatment response. (e.g.
triamcinolone acetonide 40mg [1ml] for the knee, hip or shoulder or 20mg [0.5ml] for elbow, ankle, wrist or subtalar 8. The needle through which the radiopharmaceutical has been injected should be flushed before and during withdrawal with E Instructions for patients
The importance of joint immobilisation following treatment should be emphasised. The treating clinician must advise the patient on reducing unnecessary radiation exposure to family members and the public. Written instructions should be Following treatment, patients should avoid pregnancy for at If inpatient treatment is required, nursing personnel must be instructed in radiation safety. Any significant medical conditions should be noted and contingency plans made in case radiation precautions must be breached for a medical emergency.
Concern about radiation exposure should not interfere with the prompt appropriate medical treatment of the patient.
Urinary radiopharmaceutical excretion is of particular concern during the first 2 days post administration. Patients should be advised to observe rigorous hygiene in order to avoid contaminating groups at risk using the same toilet facility.
Patients should be warned to avoid soiling underclothing or areas around toilet bowls for 1 wk post injection and that significantly soiled clothing should be washed separately. A double toilet flush is recommended after urination. Patients should wash their hands after urination.
Incontinent patients should be catheterised prior to radiopharmaceutical administration. The catheter should remain in place for 3 to 4 days. Catheter bags should be emptied frequently. Gloves should be worn by staff caring for Radiopharmaceuticals
1. 90Y colloids are suitable for the knee joint only. The recommended activity per joint is 185 – 222 MBq (5 – 6 mCi).
2. 186Re sulphur colloid is suitable for hip, shoulder, elbow, wrist, ankle and Both the administered activity and the injected volume of 186Re sulphide colloid vary according to the volume of the joint to be Adm. activity MBq (mCi)
Recommended volume
The total activity of 186Re at a single session should not exceed 370MBq 3. 169Er citrate colloid is suitable for metacarpophalangeal, metatarsophalangeal and digital interphalangeal joints.
Both the administered activity and the injected volume of 169Er citrate according to the volume of the joint to be treated as follows: Adm. activity MBq (mCi)
Recommended volume
The total 169Er-citrate activity injected at a single session should notexceed 750 MBq (20 mCi).
Doses of radiocolloids delivered to synovium have been estimated from models of joints using a series of assumptions. Physicians are referred to: Johnson and Yanch Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34 (12): 1521-30, Bowering and Keeling. Br J Radiol 1978; 51: 836-837; Husák et al. Phys Med Biol 1973; 18 (6): 848–54; Johnson et al. Eur J Nucl Med 1995; 22(9): Extra-articular (unwanted) radiation exposure and consequent doses Radio-pharmaceutical
Numbers of

*Significantly greater extra-articular radiation detection in patients within the groupwho did/could not manage to immobilize joints after injection Guidelines for measuring the activity to be administered
Use a dose calibrator specially configured to quantify beta emissions. Pre and post administration measurements should be made to establish the exact injected Side effects
Follow up
Post therapy imaging should be undertaken, where possible, to confirm appropriate radiopharmaceutical distribution within the Patients should be reviewed 6-8 weeks after injection. Review should include clinical and laboratory indices of treatment response, assessment of synovial inflammation and of possible In cases where clinical evaluation cannot provide reliable indication of failure/response and where appropriate pre- injection MR/ultrasound data are available, further MR/ultrasound may be of value to document changes in Clinical examination and ultrasound should be repeated at 3-4 months/6 months and 12 months after treatment.
Pain reduction typically occurs 1-3 weeks post injection.
Treatment failure is likely if no response is detected by 6 weeks A few patients who have failed to respond to the first radionuclide injection report pain reduction and improvement of joint function following re-treatment 6 months later. Two failed injections should not be followed by ISSUES REQUIRING FURTHER CLARIFICATION
Presumed mechanism of action - After intra-articular administration the radioactive particles are absorbed by thesuperficial cells of the synovium. Beta radiation leads to coagulation necrosis and Many authors recommend combined corticosteriod and radionuclide administration to reduce local inflammation and to prolong residence time of the radiopharmaceutical agent in the joint. The efficacy of combined steroid/radiocolloid therapyshould be compared with steroid alone in sufficiently powered randomised CONCISE BIBLIOGRAPHY
There are few well designed trials to evaluate the efficacy of radiosynovectomy. Only a minority are prospective and most are not well defined regarding joint disease, stage or sample size.
1. Clunie GPR, Ell PJ (1995) A survey of radiation synovectomy in Europe, Clunie GPR, Lovegrove FT: Radiation synovectomy. In: Ell and Gambhir (eds.) Nuclear Medicine in clinical diagnosis and treatment, 3rd edition.
Churchill Livingston Edinburgh Chapter 52.
Farahati J, Reiners Chr, Fischer M, Mödder G et al. (1999) Leitlinie für die Radiosynoviorthese. Nuklearmedizin 38: 244-245 Göbel D, Gratz S, v. Rothkirch T, Becker W (1997) Radiosynoviorthesis with rhenium-186 in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study of three treatment regimens. Rheumatol Int 17: 105-108 Heuft-Dorenbusch LLJ, de Vet HCW, van der Linden S (2000) Yttrium radiosynoviortheses in the treatment of knee arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis:a systemic review. Ann Rheum Dis 59: 583-586 Johnson LS, Yanch JC, Shortkroff S, Barnes CL et al. (1995) Beta-particle dosimetry in radiation synovectomy. Eur J Nucl Med 22: 977-988 Jones G (1993) Yttrium synovectomy: a meta-analysis of the literature.
Mödder G (1995) Radiosynoviorthesis: Involvement of nuclear in rheumatology and orthopaedics. Warlich Meckenheim 9. Savaser AN, Hoffmann K-T, Sörensen H, Banzer DH (1999) Die Radiosynoviorthese im Behandlungsplan chronisch-entzündlicher Gelenkerkrankungen. Z Rheumatol 58: 71-78 10. Taylor WJ, Corkill MM, Rajapaske CNA (1997) A retrospective review of yttrium-90 synovectomy in the treatment of knee arthritis. Brit J Rheumatol36: 11. Weber M (1993) Lokale Gelenkbehandlung bei chronischer Polyarthritis (cP): intraartikuläre Kortikoide und radioaktive Isotope. Schweiz Rundschau VII. DISCLAIMER
The European Association of Nuclear Medicine has written and approved guidelines to promote the cost effective use of high quality nuclear medicine therapeutic procedures. These generic recommendations cannot be rigidly applied to all patients in all practice settings. The guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper procedures or exclusive of other procedures reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.
Advances in medicine occur at a rapid rate. The date of a guideline should always be considered in determining its current applicability.
The EANM Radionuclide Therapy Committee has been involved in the process of guideline development for undertaking radionuclide therapies since 1995. A multinational group of therapy experts developed a series of monographs on the radioncuclide therapy agents licensed for use throughout Europe. Subsequently a series of protocols was published on the Internet for use by members of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. The monographs and protocols were achieved through a process of consensus taking note of the evidence available at the time of writing.
The monographs and protocols have been in the public domain for four years and comments have been received from members of the nuclear medicine community. The guidelines have been developed using material within the monographs and protocols and have been formatted to harmonise with the Society of Nuclear Medicine Therapy Guidelines format.
This guideline has been developed in close collaboration with Dr G Clunie and Prof M Fischer who jointly contributed to the original text and provided an invaluable source of practical advice on radiosynovectomy.

Source: http://www.isotopterapi.se/Rekom/gl_radio_synovectomy.pdf

Microsoft word - allpositive.docx

Uncle Fester - The Father of Home Cooked Methamphetamine If Albert Hofmann was the "Father Of LSD," it's probably appropriate to call Steve Preisler the "Father Of Modern Meth-Making." "Uncle Fester" is the pseudonym, or "pen name," used by Steve Preisler to write his books. In the early 1980's, he gained cult status after publishing his first book "Secrets o


1. The average time it takes for a person to experience pain relief from aspirin is 25 minutes. A new ingredient is added to help speed up relief. Let µ denote the average time to obtain pain relief with the new product. An experiment is conducted to verify if the new product is better. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (a) H 0 : µ = 25 vs. Ha : µ 25 (GO TO 2) (b) H

Copyright © 2010-2018 Pharmacy Drugs Pdf