Microsoft word - 13-775-pioglitazone versus metformin-gad.doc
PIOGLITAZONE VERSUS METFORMIN IN TWO RAT MODELS OF GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE AND DIABETES MOHAMED Z GADa*, NOHA A EHSSANb, MANSOUR H GHIETc AND LOBNA F WAHMANb aBiochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt bHormone Evaluation and cBiochemistry Departments, National Organization of Drug Control and Research ABSTRACT Insulin resistance has been implicated in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. High fat diets cause insulin resistance. Both metformin and pioglitazone are considered “insulin sensitizers” and used as antihyperglycemic agents for type 2 diabetes treatment. The aim of this study is to Compare pioglitazone and metformin effects on carbohydrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity in diabetic and glucose intolerant rats on high fat diet. Male albino rats were randomized to seven groups. The 1st group received high carbohydrate diet (control). The 2nd, 3rd and 4th groups received high sunflower oil diets for 6 weeks and either left untreated, or given pioglitazone or metformin during the last 3 weeks. The 5th, 6th, and 7th groups were made diabetic by STZ injection on day 15 of the 6 weeks-high fat diet regimen. They were either left untreated, or given pioglitazone or metformin during the last 3 weeks. High-fat diet induced glucose intolerance; represented by increase of serum glucose associated with increase in liver glucose-6-phosphatase and decreases in liver glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and glucokinase activities. No significant differences were observed between pioglitazone and metformin. In diabetic rats, both pioglitazone and metformin decreased elevated serum glucose by ~30%. Only metformin increased hepatic glycogen, and normalized glucose-6-phosphatase activity. On the other hand, pioglitazone normalized elevated renal glycogen content and increased glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. High sunflower oil diet impaired glucose tolerance. Pioglitazone and metformin had comparable effects on estimates of carbohydrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity in high-fat fed rats, but different effects in diabetic rats. Keywords: Pioglitazone – metformin – carbohydrate metabolism – high fat diet – type 2 diabetes. INTRODUCTION
carbohydrate and low fiber diets increase the incidence of
insulin resistance (McAuley and Mann, 2006).
Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common endocrine
disorders affecting almost 6% of the world's population.
Pioglitazone and metformin are extensively used in Egypt
According to report of the International Diabetes
and worldwide to treat patients with type II diabetes. Both
Federation in 2001, the number of diabetic patients will
drugs are considered to be insulin “sensitizers”. However,
reach 300 million in 2025. More than 97% of these
the full mechanism of action of those two drugs is still
patients will have type II diabetes (Adeghate et al., 2006).
unraveled and further investigations remain in necessity
In Egypt, one study estimated the combined prevalence of
to compare their clinical efficacy in different models of
diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes in the Egyptian
population ≥ 20 years of age to be 9.3% with a gradient
increase from rural (4.9%) to urban areas from lower
Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD) insulin sensitizer,
(13.5%) to higher (20%) socioeconomic standard is a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (Herman et al., 1997).
(PPAR-γ) agonist. It increases insulin sensitivity by
regulating the expression of a variety of genes involved in
Insulin resistance, defined as a state of reduced carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, increases GLUT-4 responsiveness to normal circulating levels of insulin,
and glucokinase activity, decreases phosphoenol pyruvate
plays a major role in the development of type 2 diabetes.
carboxykinase (PEPCK) expression, and decreases
While there is a genetic component involved in production by fat cell of several mediators that may cause developing insulin resistance, onset appears to be insulin resistance, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF triggered by lifestyle. Obesity, along with physical α) and resistin (Cheng and Fantus, 2005; Tjokroprawiro, inactivity, can account for approximately 50% of the
2006). Pioglitazone increases hepatic and peripheral
variability in the insulin mediated glucose disposal in
insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting gluconeogenesis and
healthy, non-diabetic, normotensive individuals (Reaven
increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake
et al., 2004). High saturated fat, high calorie, processed
(Waugh et al., 2006). The prediabetic treatment with
*Corresponding author: Tel.: +202-27590717, Fax: +202-27581041, e-mail: [email protected]
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Pioglitazone and metformin in glucose intolerance and diabetes
pioglitazone, despite significant weight gain, completely
the other used chemicals were of the highest analytical
prevents the development of diabetes and enhances β cell
function with preservation of islet cell changes in rats
Animals
Male Wistar albino rats weighing 170–190 g, purchased
Metformin is the only available biguanide in the market.
from National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt, were used
The mechanisms of metformin-mediated improvement of
in the study. The rats were kept in controlled environment
insulin sensitivity have remained obscure, despite and fed ad libitum throughout the study. Study protocols multiple pathways of action being proposed, including a
were approved by the local ethics committee in the
decrease of hepatic glucose production, an increase of
peripheral glucose utilization and a reduction of intestinal
glucose absorption. It has been documented that Diets metformin activates 5'AMP activated protein kinase Rats were randomly assigned to either one of two diet (AMPK) in hepatocytes, thereby reducing activity of
regimens; control rats (n=9) were fed high carbohydrate
acetyl CoA carboxylase and lowering expression of diet (20% Kcal protein, 10% fat, 70% carbohydrate) , all lipogenic transcription factor as well as inhibiting hepatic
the rest of rats (n=70) were fed high-fat diet (20% Kcal
gluconeogenesis (Cheng et al., 2006). The Diabetes protein, 60% fat, 20% carbohydrate). Diets used in this Prevention Program (DPP) found that metformin study (outlined in table 1) are given ad libitum for 6 decreased new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes by 31% with
weeks. Food was withdrawn 5 hours before blood
more pronounced reduction in young under 45 years by
sampling on day 42. Rats had free access to water
44% and in the obese with body mass index (BMI)>35 by
throughout the study. Rats were weighed at the beginning
of the study and then weekly till the end of the study.
Both pioglitazone and metformin appear to have Table 1: Composition of diets used in this study additional effects in ameliorating oxidative stress and inflammation; rendering them attractive tools for
prevention of insulin resistance and diabetes (Molavi et
To our knowledge, very few studies are available that
directly compare the effects of pioglitazone and
metformin on different pathways of carbohydrate
metabolism in experimental models of glucose intolerance
and insulin resistance. Reports about the comparison
between the two drugs with regard to efficacy of glycemic
control as related to modulation of metabolism are scarce
as well. For the objectives of adding information to these
unraveled areas, we studied the effects of pioglitazone
and metformin monotherapy on key enzymes of HMP
(hexose monophosphate) shunt, gluconeogenesis and
glycolysis in liver, as well as on hepatic and renal
glycogen contents in experimental models of glucose
intolerance and diabetes. Estimates did not pick major
differences between the effects of the two drugs. Some
distinctions are displayed in the results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental design
Rats were randomly divided into 7 groups. The first group
Chemicals
(n=9) received high carbohydrate diet for 6 weeks (42
Pioglitazone HCl was provided by the raw materials
days) and left untreated (control group). All the other 6
department of NODCAR (National Organization of Drug
groups received high-fat diet continuously for 6 weeks.
Control and Research, Cairo, Egypt). Metformin HCl was
Among the 6 groups, following 3 weeks of high-fat diet
kindly provided by CID pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt.
ingestion, three groups (each n=8) were treated with
Streptozotocin, Glucose-6-phosphate sodium salt, either pioglitazone (2.7 mg/kg/day, suspended in distilled
glucokinase, NADP and ATP were purchased from water and given by oral tube) (HF Pio), metformin (180
Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). All
mg/kg/day, dissolved in distilled water and given by oral
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
tube) (HF Met), or no drug (HF) for 3 weeks. The other 3
supernatant was used for glucokinase assay according to
groups were rendered diabetic by intraperitoneal injection
the method of Jamdar and Greengard (Jamdar and
of streptozotocin (50 mg/kg) freshly prepared in 0.1M
Greengard, 1970). One unit of glucokinase is defined as
citrate buffer at pH 4.5 on day 15 and allowed to drink
micro moles of NADP/NADPH formed per minute per
oral glucose 5% w/v overnight. Minimal dose of insulin
gram fresh liver tissue at 37◦C. Two hundred fifty mg
(1unit/rat) was given for each rat on 2nd and 3rd day after
fresh liver tissue was digested with 5 ml 30% KOH and
streptozotocin administration (Wohaieb and Godin, 0.5 ml of the digested tissue was used for glycogen 1987). Induction of diabetes was confirmed on day 21
precipitation using 3 ml absolute ethanol. Glycogen was
when serum glucose level was at least 250 mg/dl (Seki et
then isolated by centrifugation for 15 minutes at 4000 rpm
al., 2004). Diabetic rats were then randomly divided into
and determined according to Montgomery method
three groups, diabetic untreated (STZ-HF) (n=7) and
(Montgomery, 1975). The same above procedure was
diabetic treated with either pioglitazone (STZ-HF Pio)
used for renal glycogen determination but using 2 ml of
(n=6) or metformin (STZ–HF Met) (n=6) with the same
protocol as that of high-fat fed rats (table 2).
Blood glucose, triglycerides and insulin Blood sampling and tissue collection
Blood glucose and triglycerides levels were determined in
On day 42 blood samples were collected in plastic
the sera using UDI (United Diagnostic Industry) glucose
centrifuge tubes and allowed to clot at 4oC for 30 minutes.
and triglycerides enzymatic kits, respectively, whereas
Serum was then separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm
serum insulin was estimated using rat insulin ELISA kit
for 20 minutes. On day 43, rats were killed. Livers and
kidneys were separated, washed with ice-cold saline,
plotted dry with filter paper, weighed and prepared at
Statistical analysis
once for studying enzyme activities and glycogen All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical contents.
Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 10 software
and Microsoft Excel. All values were presented as means
Enzyme activities and glycogen content
± S.E. (standard error). Comparisons among groups were
One hundred mg fresh liver tissue was immediately
made by application of two-way analysis of variance
homogenized in 4 ml ice cold EDTA/physiological saline
ANOVA followed by one way ANOVA and LSD post
solution and centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 20 minutes at
hoc analysis. Differences were considered statistically
1.5oC. 0.5 ml of the clear supernatant was used for
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase assay as described by
Löhr and Waller (Löhr and Waller, 1974). One unit of
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase is defined as the
amount of enzyme needed to convert 1 µmol of glucose-
Experiments on high fat-fed rats
6-phosphate per minute to 6-phosphogluconate at 25oC.
As shown in table 3, HF rats did not show significant
For glucose-6-phosphatase assay, another 100 mg fresh
differences in body, liver and kidney weights when
liver tissue was similarly homogenized in 4 ml ice cooled
compared with control rats. Similarly, serum triglycerides
citrate buffer and centrifuged at 15000 rpm for 30 minutes
and insulin were not significantly affected. On the other
at 1.5oC. 0.1 ml of the clear supernatant was used for
hand, serum glucose level was significantly elevated in
glucose-6-phosphatase assay as described by Taussky and
HF rats by 18%. This elevation was associated with 18%
Shorr (Taussky and Shorr, 1953). One unit of glucose-6-
increase in glucose-6-phosphatase activity, 31% decrease
phosphatase is defined as micro moles of inorganic
in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, and 46%
phosphate liberated per minute per gram fresh liver tissue
decrease in glucokinase activity as compared with control
at 37oC. One gram fresh liver tissue was homogenized
rats. Moreover, liver glycogen content was reduced by
with 9 ml Tris-KCl-EDTA buffer and centrifuged at
15000 rpm for 1 hour at 1.5oC. 0.025 ml of the clear
Table 2: Assignments of the study groups to drugs and diets.
x = High carbohydrate diet, + = High fat diet, ∆ = Pioglitazone (2.7mg/kg/day), • = Metformin (180 mg/kg/day), S = Streptozotocin (50 mg/kg)
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Pioglitazone and metformin in glucose intolerance and diabetes
Oral administration of pioglitazone (2.7 mg/kg/day) for
glucose level by 32% and 29%, respectively. This
21 days was able to significantly decrease body weight
decrease was associated with significant decrease in
and glucose-6-phosphatase activity by 12% and 22%,
kidney glycogen by 52% and significant increase in
respectively as compared to HF group. Meanwhile, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity by 20% in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity was the pioglitazone group. In the metformin group, however, increased by 29%. Other parameters were affected by
blood glucose level decrease was associated with
pioglitazone administration but not significantly under the
significant increase in liver glycogen by 125% and
conditions of the experiment. We were not able to detect
significant decrease in glucose-6-phosphatase activity by
significant differences between results of the 29%. The significant differences between the two aforementioned pioglitazone group and the results of oral
treatments were elicited in liver and kidney glycogen
administration of metformin (180 mg/kg/day) for 21 days.
contents and activities of glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphatase.
Experiments on high fat-fed STZ diabetic rats
As compared to control rats, STZ-HF rats showed DISCUSSION
significant decreases in body weight, serum insulin, and
liver glycogen by 17%, 51% and 85%, respectively.
The main objective of our study is to compare the effects
These were associated with significant increases in kidney
of pioglitazone and metformin on carbohydrate
weight by 42%, renal glycogen by 92% and serum
metabolism and insulin sensitivity in prediabetic and
glucose by 314%. Serum triglycerides were not altered
diabetic states. We are unaware of similar study that
significantly. With regard to liver carbohydrate focuses on the similarities and differences between the
metabolizing enzymes, significant increase in glucose-6-
two drugs on carbohydrate metabolism. Although it is
phosphatase activity by 22% and decreases in glucose-6-
commonly stated that thiazolidinediones lower glucose
phosphate dehydrogenase and glucokinase activities by
concentration primarily by increasing glucose uptake and
47% and 65%, respectively were observed in STZ-HF rats
metformin by decreasing glucose production, the data
as compared to control animals (table 3).
supporting these statements are scarce and often
contradictory (Inzucchi, 2002; Kerpichnikov et al., 2002).
Oral administration of pioglitazone (2.7 mg/kg/day) and
In vitro and animal studies have identified multiple
metformin (180 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced blood
potential targets for these drugs (Basu et al., 2008).
Table 3: The effects of administration of pioglitazone and metformin for 21 days on study parameters in high fat-fed and STZ diabetic rats. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.
a Significance from control at p<0.05
b Significance from high fat-fed rats for groups HF Pio, HF Met , STZ-HF at p<0.05
c Significance from STZ-HF diabetic rats for groups STZ-HF Pio and STZ-HF Met at p<0.05
d Significance from STZ-HF Pio for group STZ-HF Met at p<0.05.
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Moreover, the results have not always been consistent in
Impairment of insulin production by streptozotocin added
to the results of high-fat diet several modifications.
Compared to the HF-group, STZ-HF animals experienced
For these reasons, we tested the drugs in two models of
lower body weights, hepatic glycogen contents, serum
impaired glucose tolerance; one is induced by high-fat
insulin and activities of glucose-6-phosphate dehydro-
diet only (prediabetic state) and the other is induced by
genase and glucokinase. Meanwhile higher renal weight,
high-fat diet associated with impaired insulin secretion
renal glycogen content, and serum glucose were observed.
This pattern well complies with the reported biochemical
changes in experimental model of type II diabetes.
The model of high-fat diet-induced glucose intolerance
had been extensively used by others and was shown to
Doses chosen for pioglitazone and metformin in this study
impair carbohydrate metabolism, increase hepatic glucose
are in harmony with their therapeutic doses in human,
production and induce insulin resistance (Wilkes et al.,
being equivalent to 30 mg/day for pioglitazone and 2000
1998; Mithieux et al., 2002; Henriksen et al., 2008). It is
mg/day for metformin. Drugs were administered for 3
generally accepted that high-fat diets can be used to
weeks to study their effects when given as chronic
generate a valid rodent model for the metabolic syndrome
treatments, and were administered concomitantly with
with insulin resistance and compromised ß-cell function
diet to study their effects under uncontrolled diet
(Buettner et al., 2006). Sunflower oil, which is used in
this study to induce glucose intolerance, is very similar in
composition to safflower (carthame) oil that has been
In presence of high-fat diet, administration of pioglitazone
used in previous studies for that purpose (Wilkes
or metformin caused almost similar biochemical changes,
but with few exceptions. Both drugs did not show
et al., 2002). Sunflower oil is very
abundant in Egypt and represents the main oil used in
significant effects in this model with regard to liver and
kidney weights, serum glucose and insulin levels, and
glucokinase activity. On the other hand, they significantly
It was previously reported that rats fed HF diets for 3
improved glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity
weeks exhibited moderate hepatic insulin resistance as
and normalized glucose-6-phosphatase activity. These
compared with rats fed HF diets for 6 weeks (Mithieux
findings are consistent with the findings of Sugiyama et al. for pioglitazone effect on glucose-6-phosphatase
al., 2002). The 6 weeks model was thus used in this study. Results demonstrated that the 6 week sunflower-rich diet
activity and oppose their findings for pioglitazone on
increased hepatic glucose output through several glucokinase activity, which showed increased hepatic mechanisms; significant reduction in hepatic glycogen
glucokinase activity by pioglitazone. This may be
deposition, stimulation of the gluconeogenic glucose-6-
attributed to the differences in the insulin resistance
phosphatase activity and decreased hepatic glucose model used, as Sugiyama et al. used genetically obese utilization through reducing the activities of the HMP
Wistar rats (Sugiyama et al., 1990). For metformin, these
shunt enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and
findings are consistent with those of Mithieux et al.
(2002). The shift of glucose-6-phosphate flux to HMP
shunt, mediated by reduction of glucose-6-phosphatase
The molecular mechanisms behind high-fat diet-induced
and increase in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, is
glucose intolerance are still not fully revealed. However,
also consistent with the findings of Kletzien et al. (1992)
several mechanisms were postulated. One study for pioglitazone and Mithieux et al. (2002) for metformin correlated the increased glucose intolerance caused by
(Kletzien et al., 1992; Mithieux et al., 2002).
high-fat diet to the elevated levels of plasma NEFA
However, it was noticeable that the decrease of glucose-6-
(nonesterified fatty acids) (Wang et al., 2002). Others
phosphatase activity was not accompanied by stimulation
referred to the elevated circulating leptins, PPAR-gamma
of hepatic glycogenesis. Rather, a remarkable decrease in
genotype susceptibility, increased fatty acid oxidation in
liver glycogen was observed for both drugs as compared
muscles, and deficiency in muscle mitochondria (Ahren
to normal and untreated HF animals. These data
and Scheurink, 1998; Kadowaki et al., 2003; Bringolf et
contradict the findings of Mithieux et al. for metformin
al., 2005; Hancock et al., 2008). Özela et al. indicated
and that of Sugiyama et al. for pioglitazone (Mithieux et
that neither defects in insulin receptor function nor al., 2002; Sugiyama et al., 1990). In the former study
elevated membrane glycoprotein PC-1 activities are liver glycogen content was dramatically increased by 3-5
involved in the development of insulin resistance in rats
times by concomitant administration of 50 mg/kg/day
with high-fat feeding, and the insulin resistance induced
metformin with high-fat diet for 6 weeks. In the second
with high-fat feeding is likely due to postreceptor defects
study 0.3-3 mg/kg/d for 7 days pioglitazone enhanced
in skeletal muscle (Özela et al., 1996). The door is still
insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in genetically-obese
hyperglycemic rats. Meanwhile, our results are consistent
with the findings of Radziuk and Pye who reported the
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Pioglitazone and metformin in glucose intolerance and diabetes
decrease of both gluconeogenesis and glycogen synthesis
effect on body weight, where metformin is known to
by metformin and with those of Otto et al. who reported
decrease or at least not to increase body weight and
inhibition of glycogen synthesis by metformin in cultured
pioglitazone is known to increase body weight via water
rat hepatocytes (Radziuk and Pye, 2001; Otto et al.,
retention (Cheng and Fantus, 2005). The increase in
kidney weight in STZ-HF Met group is correlated with
Contradictory data for the metabolic effects of pioglitazone and metformin are not uncommon in STZ-HF rats showed increased glucose-6-phosphatase literature. One of the observed differences between activity associated with reduced activities of both pioglitazone and metformin is the more pronounced glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and glucokinase reduction in body weight of rats on pioglitazone therapy.
activities. This shift is mainly induced by the high
These rats showed reduced rate of body weight gain from
glucagon/insulin ratio in STZ animals. Similar to its effect
in HF rats, metformin was able in STZ-HF rats to
normalize glucose-6-phosphatase activity. This is
To compare the effects of pioglitazone and metformin in
consistent with the findings of Heishi et al., who found
the diabetic state, rats were fed high-fat diet before STZ
reduction of glucose-6-phosphatase gene expression
injection and this feeding was continued throughout the
associated with reduction of glucose-6-phosphatase
study. High-fat feeding induced insulin resistance and
activity in livers of obese diabetic db/db mice (Heishi et
STZ injection induced partial β cell destruction and
al., 2006). However, the insignificant effect of metformin
insulin deficiency, giving a diabetic model similar to the
on glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity
pathophysiologic changes in type 2 diabetic human, being
contradicts the findings of Ashokkumar et al. that
preceded by insulin resistance state before β cell failure
demonstrated the ability of metformin to restore glucose-
and appearance of overt diabetes (Cheng and Fantus,
6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity almost to control
levels. However, this experiment was done in neonatal
STZ induced diabetic rats, where a single 100 mg/kg STZ
With regard to the effects of pioglitazone and metformin
injection was given to 2 days old rats (Ashokkumar et al.,
on diabetic rats, both drugs succeeded to reduce serum
2005). On the other hand, pioglitazone was able in STZ-
glucose level elevated by STZ by ~30 %. This complies
HF rats to increase glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
with the findings of Pavo et al. who reported comparable
activity, similar to its effect on HF rats.
improvement in glycemic control by pioglitazone and
metformin in patients with type II diabetes (Pavo et al.,
Finally, our salient conclusions of this study are:
1) High-sunflower oil diet impairs glucose tolerance and
disrupts carbohydrate metabolism via decreasing
The decrease of glycogen content in liver (insulin
hepatic glycogen content and impairing activities of
dependent tissue) and the increase in kidneys (insulin
glucose-6-phosphatase, glucose-6-phosphate dehy-
independent tissue) in STZ animals well complies with
previous reports (Gad et al., 2006). Only pioglitazone was
2) STZ induced diabetes caused marked elevation in
able to reduce elevated renal glycogen content in STZ-HF
serum glucose level associated with marked decrease
rats. On the other hand, only metformin increased hepatic
in serum insulin level and body weight, impairment
glycogen content. These observations are similar to the
of carbohydrate metabolism as demonstrated by
findings of Okine et al. who observed an increase in
dramatic decrease in hepatic glycogen content,
hepatic glycogen content of STZ induced diabetic mice
increase in renal glycogen content and impairment of
after metformin administration (Okine et al., 2005). This
activities of glucose-6-phosphatase, glucose-6-
contradicts our findings of metformin effect on hepatic
phosphate dehydrogenase and glucokinase.
glycogen content of HF rats, suggesting that the inhibitory
3) In high-fat diet rats, metformin and pioglitazone had
effect of metformin on glycogen synthesis is lost under
almost similar effects; both activated glucose-6-
phosphate flux to HMP shunt, mediated by reduction
of glucose-6-phosphatase and increase in glucose-6-
Previous studies have shown that STZ diabetic rats
exhibited severe loss of body weight associated with a
4) In diabetic high-fat diet rats, metformin and
significant increase in kidney weight as well as kidney
pioglitazone equally depressed elevated serum
weight to body weight ratio (Gad et al., 2006). These
glucose level by ~30%. Pioglitazone therapy was
alterations were also evident in our study. Reduced body
associated with a decrease in renal glycogen and an
weight of STZ-HF rats was further reduced by metformin,
increase in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
though not significant, and was slightly increased by
activity. On the other hand, metformin therapy was
pioglitazone. This is consistent with the well known
associated with an increase in hepatic glycogen and
properties of metformin and pioglitazone concerning their
normalization of glucose-6-phosphatase activity.
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Further comparative studies between pioglitazone and
action of the Egyptian plants Fenugreek and Balanites.
metformin are recommended on the metabolic, cellular
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 281: 173-183.
and molecular levels to show whether or not pioglitazone
Hancock CR, Han DH, Chen M, Terada S, Yasuda T,
has any added favorable actions than the cheaper, safer,
Wright DC and Holloszy JO (2008). High-fat diets
cause insulin resistance despite an increase in muscle
mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 105(22): ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Heishi M, Ichihara J, Teramoto R, Itakura Y, Hayashi K,
This research is partially funded by Hormone Evaluation
Ishikawa H, Gomi H, Sakai J, Kanaoka M, Taiji M and
Department at National Organization of Drug Control and
Kimura T (2006). Global gene expression analysis in
Research (NODCAR), Cairo, Egypt. Metformin was
liver of obese diabetic db/db mice treated with
kindly supplied by CID Pharmaceuticals, Cairo, Egypt.
metformin. Diabetologia, 49(7): 1647-1655.
Henriksen EJ, Teachey MK, Lindborg KA, Diehl CJ and
REFERENCES
Beneze AN (2008). The high-fat-fed lean Zucker rat: a
spontaneous isocaloric model of fat-induced insulin
Adeghate E, Schattner P and Dunn E (2006). An Update
resistance associated with muscle GSK-3 overactivity.
on the etiology and epidemiology of diabetes mellitus.
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 294(6): Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1084: 1-29.
Ahren B and Scheurink AJ (1998). Marked Herman WH, Aubert RE, Ali MA, Sous ES and Badran A
hyperleptinemia after high-fat diet associated with
(1997). Diabetes mellitus in Egypt: risk factors,
severe glucose intolerance in mice. Eur. J. Endocrin.,
prevalence and future burden. Eastern Mediterranean 139(4): 461-467. Health Journal, 3: 144-148.
Ashcroft JS (2006). Lifestyle and metformin are the way
Inzucchi SE (2002). Oral antihyperglycemic therapy for
forward. BMJ, 333: 918-919.
type 2 diabetes: scientific review. JAMA, 287: 360-372.
Ashokkumar N, Pari L, Manimekalai A and Selvaraju K
Jamdar SC and Greengard O (1970). Premature formation
(2005). Effect of N-benzoyl-D-phenylalanine on
of glucokinase in developing rat liver. J. Biol. Chem.,
streptozotocin-induced changes in the lipid and
245: 2779-2783.
lipoprotein profile in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,
Kadowaki T, Hara K, Yamauchi T, Terauchi Y, Tobe K
57(3): 359-366.
and Nagai R (2003). Molecular Mechanism of Insulin
Basu R, Shah P, Basu A, Norby B, Dicke B,
Resistance and Obesity. Exp. Biol. Med., 228: 1111-
Chandramouli V, Cohen O, Landau BR and Rizza RA
(2008). Comparison of the effects of pioglitazone and
Kerpichnikov D, McFarlane SI and Sowers JR (2002).
metformin on hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin action
Metformin: an update. Ann. Intern. Med., 137: 25-33.
in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, 57(1): 24-31.
Kletzien RF, Clarke SD and Ulrich RG (1992).
Bringolf M, Zaragoza N, Rivier D and Felber JB (2005).
Enhancement of adipocyte differentiation by an
Studies on the metabolic effects induced in the rat by a
insulin-sensitizing agent. Mol. Pharmacol., 41(2): 393-
high-fat diet. Eur. J. Biochem., 26(3): 360-367.
Buettner R, Parhofer KG, Woenckhaus M, Wrede CE,
Löhr GW and Waller HD (1974). Glucose-6 phosphate
Kunz-Schughart LA, Schölmerich J and Bollheimer LC
dehydrogenase. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed). Methods of
(2006). Defining high-fat-diet rat models: metabolic
Enzymatic Analysis, Second Edition., Verlag-Chemie,
and molecular effects of different fat types. Journal of
Weinheim and Academic Press, New York, London,
Molecular Endocrinology, 36: 485-501.
Cheng AY and Fantus IG (2005). Oral antihyperglycemic
McAuley K and Mann J (2006). Nutritional determinants
therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. CMAJ, 172(2):
of insulin resistance. Journal of Lipid Research, 47:
Cheng JT, Huang CC, Liu IM, Tzeng TF and Chang CJ
Mithieux G, Guignot L, Bordet JC and Wiernsperger N
(2006). Novel Mechanism for plasma glucose–
(2002). Intrahepatic mechanisms underlying the effect
lowering action of metformin in streptozotocin-induced
of metformin in decreasing basal glucose production in
diabetic rats. Diabetes, 55: 819-825.
rats fed a high-fat diet. Diabetes, 51: 139-143.
Choi SH, Zhao ZS, Lee YJ, Kim SK, Kim DJ, Ahn CW,
Molavi B, Rassouli N, Bagwe S and Rasouli N (2007). A
Lim SK, Lee HC and Cha BS (2007). The different
review of thiazolidinediones and metformin in the
mechanisms of insulin sensitizers to prevent type 2
treatment of type 2 diabetes with focus on
diabetes in OLETF rats. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev.,
cardiovascular complications. Vasc. Health Risk 23(5): 411-418. Manag., 3(6): 967-973.
Gad MZ, El-Sawalhi MM, Ismail MF and El-Tanbouly
Montgomery R (1975). Determination of glycogen.
ND (2006). Biochemical study of the anti-diabetic
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 67: 378-386.
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Pioglitazone and metformin in glucose intolerance and diabetes
Okine LK, Nyarko AK, Osei-Kwabena N, Oppong IV,
derived neurotrophic factor in early retinal neuropathy
Barnes F and Ofosuhene M (2005). The antidiabetic
of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Diabetes,
activity of the herbal preparation ADD-199 in mice: A
53: 2412-2419.
comparative study with two oral hypoglycaemic drugs.
Sugiyama Y, Shimura Y and Ikeda H (1990). Effects of
J. Ethnopharmacol., 97(1): 31-38.
pioglitazone on hepatic and peripheral insulin
Otto M, Breinholt J and Westergaard N (2003).
resistance in Wistar fatty rats. Arzneimittelforschung,
Metformin inhibits glycogen synthesis and
40(4): 436-440.
gluconeogenesis in cultured rat hepatocytes. Diabetes
Taussky HH and Shorr E (1953). A microcolorimetric
Obes. Metab., 5(3): 189-194.
method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus.
Özela B, Youngrenb JF, Kima JK, Goldfineb ID, Sunga
J. Biol. Chem., 202: 675-685.
CK and Youn JH (1996). The development of insulin
Tjokroprawiro A (2006). New approach in the treatment
resistance with high fat feeding in rats does not involve
of T2DM and metabolic syndrome (focus on a novel
either decreased insulin receptor tyrosine kinase
insulin sensitizer). Acta Med. Indones, 38(3): 160-166.
activity or membrane glycoprotein PC-1. Biochemical
Wang Y, Miura Y, Kaneko T, Li J, Qin L, Wang
and Molecular Medicine, 59(2): 174-181.
P, Matsui H and Sato A (2002). Glucose intolerance
Pavo I, Jermendy G, Varkonyi TT, Kerenyi Z, Gyimesi A,
induced by a high-fat/low-carbohydrate diet in rats
Shoustov S, Shestakova M, Herz M, Johns D,
.Effects of nonesterified fatty acids. Endocrine, 17:
Schluchter BJ, Festa A and Tan MH (2003). Effect of
pioglitazone compared with metformin on glycemic
Waugh J, Keating GM, Plosker GL, Easthope S and
control and indicators of insulin sensitivity in recently
Robinson DM (2006). Pioglitazone: a review of its use
diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Clin.
in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs, 66(1): 85-109. Endocrin. Metabol., 88(4): 1637-1645.
Wilkes JJ, Bonen A and Bell RC (1998). A modified
Radziuk J and Pye S (2001). Hepatic glucose uptake,
high-fat diet induces insulin resistance in rat skeletal
gluconeogenesis and the regulation of glycogen
muscle but not adipocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol.
synthesis. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., 17(4): 250-272. Metab., 275: E679-E686.
Reaven G, Abbasi F and McLaughlin T (2004). Obesity,
Wohaieb SA and Godin DV (1987). Alterations in free
insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease. Recent
radical tissue-defense mechanisms in streptozotocin-
Progress in Hormone Research, 59: 207-223.
induced diabetes in rat. Diabetes, 36: 1014-1018.
Seki M, Tanaka T, Nawa H, Usui T, Fukuchi T, Ikeda K,
Abe H and Takei N (2004). Involvement of brain-
Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., Vol.23, No.3, July 2010, pp.305-312
Sample Protocol: Administration of Epinephrine and Benadryl NOTE: The signs and symptoms of anaphylactic shock are: hypotension, respiratory distress such as laryngeal edema, dyspnea, wheezing, a sense of retrosternal pressure or tightness, rapid and/or irregular pulse, urticaria, loss of consciousness, agitation, faintness, burning and/or itching eyes, tearing, congestion and